Former India cricketer: Virat Kohli was adjudged. LBW by the on-field umpire, while the third umpire decided not to appeal the judgment after finding “no solid evidence.”
Former India cricketer Pragyan Ojha offered a unique perspective on. India skipper Virat Kohli’s dismissal, which was one of the most talked-about moments of the second Test between India and. New Zealand in Mumbai on Day 1. Kohli was given. LBW by the on-field umpire, and the third umpire decided not to reverse the judgment after finding “no solid evidence.” The cricketing community was split over the incident. Many believed. Kohli hit the ball before it reached his pads, but some, like Simon Doull, believed the third umpire followed the “correct method.”
Ojha, on the other hand, had a different perspective on the events. Former India left-arm bowler. Virender Sharma was mentioned as the third umpire.
It all happened in the Indian innings’ 30th over, when Ajaz Patel foxed Kohli with a straighter one. Because he was fast to raise his finger, umpire. Anil Chaudhary had no doubts that it was pad first.
The star batsman, who returned to head the side after stepping down as T20I captain and taking a rest, requested a review of the LBW decision.
Virender Sharma, the TV umpire, reviewed multiple replays, some of which suggested the ball may have struck the bat first.
He has. Been. Overheard. Remarking, “The ball, bat. And pad appear to be in the same place. I don’t have any compelling evidence to the contrary.”
Let’s answer to learn more about 1CRIC playing strategy and information related to this game through the following article of MY CRICKET DEAL.
Read more about: Top 10 of Best Cricket Teams
Visit also: Unvaccinated people would be denied
[…] Visit also: Former India cricketer […]